This is how it went when the con-artist known the world over as Hilliary was interviewed for Arutz Sheva.
“When asked by interviewer Yonit Levi whether she would, if elected president, she would [sic] pursue the war on ISIS differently than her predecessor and, specifically, if she would refer to the conflict as a “war on radical Islam” - noting that the Obama administration has shied away from referencing “radical Islam” – Clinton suggested use of such terminology could actually strengthen Islamic terror.
“We’ve made a judgment, based on a lot of research, that bringing Islam into the definition of our enemy actually serves the purpose of the radical Jihadists, and there’s a lot of evidence of that,” Clinton responded.” ”
Just a couple of small points: there’s no research and there’s no evidence. She made that up, or, if you prefer, she lied (again, sigh).
It seems that she is constitutionally incapable of telling the truth about anything – anything at all!
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Thank G-d that The Donald is an honest, if sometimes verbally clumsy, man. I'll take the clumsy honest man over the dextrous liar any day.