by The Law
See this VIDEO (29 seconds):
"Normally at Christmas we think of the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ. I wonder though with this year we might remember how the story of the nativity unfolds with the fleeing of the Holy Family to escape violent persecution.
And we might also remember that when the prophet Muhammad migrated from Mecca to Medina, he did so because he too was seeking the freedom for himself and his followers to worship.”
[Transcript - The Law]
Muhammad was ostensibly indeed seeking freedom of religion but the problem is that freedom of religion for Muhammad and his distinctly unmerry men meant freedom of religion to make all others ("non-Muslims”) unfree.
This is the “freedom” that the votaries of Islam claim to this day.
The “invitation” from Islam is to submit or die: "invite them to three courses of action" to "conversion, submission or death” and that is an offer that cannot be refused, made in the name of religion.
However the “invitation" is under duress and so it is actually not a religious invitation but a political invitation.
Islam is a political movement heavily disguised in religious cloth, shrouded in a veil one might say.
That it is regarded as religion is its strength, its great strength. (In wiser days of yore Islam was regarded per Hugh Fitzgerald as a faith, a fanatical faith.)
That Islam is a political movement is its weakness.
That weakness must be exposed, discussed, exploited and used.
It is the only hope free people/countries have of reversing the inexorable rise of Islam and the destruction of civilization.
4. Prince Charles of England turns Christmas into all about Islam and nothing about Christianity.
(An entire essay could be written on how what he said is pure nonsense. But in a paragraph suffice it to say that Islam’s founder, the rapist and mass murderer Mohammad, took an army to Yathrib from Mecca to conquer it and murdered countless people, and raped and looted pretty much all the rest. This is the foundation stone for the Islamic calendar, and a patently insane comparison for any spiritual journey that may have been done by Jesus Christ. Whether in historical secularism, or in biblical mythology.)
Aside from British comedian George Galloway, I can think of no other Brit as stupid as Charles. He showed his level of intelligence when he dumped Diana for Camilla.
He's always been a risible figure - British readers in particular will remember the talikng to plants - but propagating this wilful ignorance of Mohammedanism is actively dangerous. I hope he never becomes King.
My take on the Christmas Address:
Slightly more detailed, more disrespectful but otherwise similar.